Thanks

Moderators: Classitar, pied_piper, Phineas
Actually, as far as I have read, it's the other way around: Different bores don't impact the sound, it's actually due to the difference in maximum size of the tone holes. Other than that, the conical bore achieves nearly the same effect as the taper in the headjoint of a cylindrical bore flute. Of course, having a cylindrical bore would mean you could have larger tone holes, and is likely why it's "shriller."pp wrote:The material may have some impact on the sound, but the effect is slight when compared to the different bores.
The person I was talking to didn't you "can't" get a sweeter softer tone out of a metel piccolo, just that it was harder to do and harder to get the timbre to fit in with most orchestras. Basiclly that it was just less desireable.wkzh wrote: IMHO, having a "sweet tone" is not a requirement. Why can't a piccolo play with a blaring tone sometimes when the context calls for it? Does anybody complain that the organ flue pipes are made of metal and are cylindrical hence are too shrill? Actually, yes, and hence they use other stops to produce the desired tone. You can't actually say that nobody uses cylindrical piccolos because it's shrill unless you've experienced such a performance yourself.
Basically, limited flexibility (if I may add a local interjection, "lah"). I believe musicians should get instruments that cater to their needs, rather than musicians cater to their instruments' limitations. After all, it's called an "instrument" for a reason, isn't it? If a musician can make better music on one instrument compared to another, why not use the better one? Practical reasons, perhaps, e.g. $$, life's full of compromises. Of course, mastery and perfection are still on the musician's part, so "better instruments" are no reason to slack off!Arlee wrote:The person I was talking to didn't you "can't" get a sweeter softer tone out of a metel piccolo, just that it was harder to do and harder to get the timbre to fit in with most orchestras. Basiclly that it was just less desireable.
As I said, it looks coolerpp wrote:Regarding the bubble style piccolo headjoint, it's partly style/appearance,
Actually, from a purely mechanistic point of view, whether you have a lip plate or not does per se not affect your playing angle. I also find that whether there's a plate or not does not affect positioning: that is a conditioned response. I myself find it stranger to have to position my embouchure on a head without a lip plate.Arlee wrote:What I am wondering is this is the first time I have played a pic without a lip plate before so it feels a little weird and I noticed when I was playing the other day that could feel a lot of air hitting my left arm while playing but if I angled down more the tone got a little airy. I was wondering if this is normal and if it is just an aspect of I need to get used to playing without a lip plate.
So far yes I do really like it. I have only had it for a few days though I am really enjoying it. The only thing really is I have had some positioning issues due to not having a lip plate. i know logically that probably should not make a difference but it feels very different than other piccolos I have played. But the suggestions pp gave have helped a bunch so I feel like that is just user error on my partMissyHPhoenix wrote:Do you like your DiMedici?
Yes! I find that very peculiar too! I experience it myself, it's very strange... Haha I shall go procure a spare piccolo head tomorrow that doesn't have a lip plate and I'll get back to you.Arlee wrote:The only thing really is I have had some positioning issues due to not having a lip plate. i know logically that probably should not make a difference but it feels very different than other piccolos I have played.