Fluteland.com Flute Message Board Forum Index Fluteland.com Flute Message Board

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

A question for the old timers
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Fluteland.com Flute Message Board Forum Index -> Flute History, Instruments and Miscellaneous
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MissyHPhoenix



Joined: 14 Mar 2008
Posts: 163
Location: Hammond, LA, USA

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, it never occurred to me that all of that goes into the matching of a headjoint to my playing. How do I find out exactly what my preferences are in that area? I have 3 different headjoints that I like to play on, and each one gives me a different feel. Is there a way I can intellectually figure out what I like about each one?
_________________
Missy

Why Be Normal????
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JButky



Joined: 27 Mar 2009
Posts: 73
Location: Nashville

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 12:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MissyHPhoenix wrote:
Wow, it never occurred to me that all of that goes into the matching of a headjoint to my playing. How do I find out exactly what my preferences are in that area? I have 3 different headjoints that I like to play on, and each one gives me a different feel. Is there a way I can intellectually figure out what I like about each one?


You can to a degree. That would require measuring and then pairing your comments with the attributes of any particular headjoint.

You can then have a basic profile that contains various aspects that you know you like.

You also have to remember that a headjoint is a system of numerous variables that interact with each other and interact with the player. The best you can hope to get is a basic profile of the type of headjoint you like. You can weight certain features to look for also with the understanding that there are tradeoffs in any headjoint since it is a complete system. Knowing what affects what helps you understand more of the individual variations that headjoints can produce for any particular player.
_________________
Joe B
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
m3the01



Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 64

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Damn Joe, its nice hearing u talk about the headjoint, i feel much more educated now.

Especially considering i will be laying down a good chunk of change for that 9701 next week.

So the Calore headjoint, platinum riser, 14k lipplate can be adjusted if its not perfect or close to, lol??

I was a little worried about not trying the other headjoints in ur lineup, ive tried only the forte on a 18K maesta gold flute, and the forza on the elegante coda model.

This post has been very educational, thank u!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pied_piper



Joined: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 519
Location: Virginia

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JButky wrote:
You also have to remember that a headjoint is a system of numerous variables that interact with each other and interact with the player. The best you can hope to get is a basic profile of the type of headjoint you like. You can weight certain features to look for also with the understanding that there are tradeoffs in any headjoint since it is a complete system. Knowing what affects what helps you understand more of the individual variations that headjoints can produce for any particular player.

Joe - Are these factors documented someplace? I'd really like to know more about this.
_________________
"Never give a flute player a screwdriver."
--anonymous
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JButky



Joined: 27 Mar 2009
Posts: 73
Location: Nashville

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pied_piper wrote:

Joe - Are these factors documented someplace? I'd really like to know more about this.


Unfortunately, they are not. You often hear that flutemakers are protecting their secrets. But that is just a way to maintain the "mystique" of the headjoint.

I'm teaching a headjoint class for technicians in July. That's one of the very few places to get first hand experience with making the measuring tools and then applying the measurements to make changes with guided practice.

It's a week long class in Illinois this coming July

I've posted my headjoint video availablity here before, but the guy who did the video and distributes it has not been on the ball lately.

I may have to make another one. The headjoint recutting clinic (1 1/2 hours) is the most popular class I teach.

The Napbirt Class is posted here:
http://www.napbirt.org/mc/community/eventdetails.do?eventId=233693&orgId=napbirt&recurringId=0
_________________
Joe B
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
pied_piper



Joined: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 519
Location: Virginia

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wish I could attend your class but I have a conflict with the dates in July and unfortunately it's not movable.

If you do another video, sign me up. Also, I'd also like to hear more about the flute book that was mentioned in the NAPBIRT class info. When is it due out, who's the publisher, etc.?
_________________
"Never give a flute player a screwdriver."
--anonymous
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JButky



Joined: 27 Mar 2009
Posts: 73
Location: Nashville

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

pied_piper wrote:
I wish I could attend your class but I have a conflict with the dates in July and unfortunately it's not movable.

If you do another video, sign me up. Also, I'd also like to hear more about the flute book that was mentioned in the NAPBIRT class info. When is it due out, who's the publisher, etc.?


That's Susan's book and it is out..

http://www.amazon.com/Dictionary-Modern-Flutist-Susan-Maclagan/dp/0810867117
_________________
Joe B
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
wtogami



Joined: 21 Feb 2010
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have tried over 30 headjoints in Boston area companies in the past month. I am so glad that I didn't pick the first headjoint that I seemed to like. I found that it is so important to compare headjoints and research the differences between different cuts, embouchure hole height, embouchure hole shape, materials of the lip plate or riser, etc. It might be that the headjoint makes more of an impact on your sound than the rest of the flute.

At first I seemed to really like the Burkart 998 C4 headjoint. Burkart has two embouchure cuts, the C4 which is more oval "classic" and M2 "modern" which is rectangular. I had real trouble playing their M2 cut headjoint which was far more free blowing. During my first visit to Burkart's workshop the C4 seemed prettier and easier to play so I had completely written off M2 in my mind.

At Brannen they have two embouchure cuts, "Modified" which is closer to a higher resistance oval classic (IIRC referring to a modified Cooper), and "Modern" which is rectangular and more free blowing. I discovered that the "Modern" Brannen headjoint was really easy for me to play. I sounded good on that flute with very little effort.

I then compared my favorite Burkart to my favorite Brannen. The 998 silver somehow achieves a deeper darkness approaching a gold-like tone. Meanwhile the Brannen sounded like what my brain thinks a great silver flute should sound like. Not exactly an apples to apples comparison for these reasons. In any case the comparison was even more difficult because my favorite Burkart was a oval shaped C4 classical cut, the opposite of the Brannen "Modern" cut with its rectangular shape.

I took both flutes to a lesson with a Boston-area teacher so I could obtain a third party opinion. She plays a 1990's Haynes but recently acquired a new Landell Argentium silver headjoint which was a significant upgrade for her. This Landell headjoint had a rectangular cut. I REALLY liked playing on that headjoint.

Later that night I thought about her rectangular cut headjoint. I realized that both the Brannen and Landell headjoints that I liked are more modern style cuts with a rectangular embouchure holes. Meanwhile I had forgotten to further compare Burkart's equivalent M2 cut because I didn't like it during initial testing weeks earlier. Landell's website has a great deal of information about headjoint options including a humorous interactive Q&A that helps you understand headjoint options to match your style. Talking to Landell himself, he describes oval holes as a good sound no matter what you do. But the rectangular is more versatile. His site says, "Loose, flexible, and fat with plenty of room to play around in. I like to move into different corners of the blowing hole and experiment with interesting tonal colors... We personally like rectangular cuts with wide lateral openings because they lend this exact quality to the head. Playing them is like driving a sports car: difficult, but 100% pure exhiliaration."

Upon visiting Landell's workshop in Vermont I discovered there many other possible considerations in the cut of a headjoint. There are various heights of the embouchure wall (medium or high for professional). There are traditional or "Cooper" undercut... I might not have fully understood this one, but it seems to be the shape of the taper of the riser. Then the materials of the tube, embouchure plate and riser. Landell had sterling silver, Argentium silver, 14K gold and Titanium headjoints. Titanium was truly unique! Nearly half the weight of silver with lightning quick response and bright tone. My personal favorite headjoint there was 14K gold, rectangular hole with high wall.

Armed with a greater understanding of headjoints I realized that I liked the Burkart C4 cut because it was easy to play. It seems however that "easy" is not always the most desirable trait. I feel that if I improved my skills through practice and expert instruction I might be able to handle a "modern" style headjoint with rectangular hole and be able to play a wider variety of tone colors.

I haven't tried any of the Japanese high-end brands mainly because I live in the Boston area. I hear good things about Muramatsu and Sankyo flutes but I just haven't had the time to try them. I kind of dislike the risk of shipping flutes for demo and it is just so easy for me to drive to the Boston-area flute companies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pied_piper



Joined: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 519
Location: Virginia

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've heard about Susan's book but since it's called a dictionary I didn't think that it had much in the way of technical info.
_________________
"Never give a flute player a screwdriver."
--anonymous
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WalterMitty



Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Posts: 21
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Highly interesting thread! Thank you all for the different information.

Recently I've heard that Japanese people are talking about similar issue with Muramatsu. I mean, Muramatsu isn't making all parts but buying from a parts maker that isn't really specialized in flute making.
Also, the flute is somewhat more fragile than before, and some people are thinking that Muramatsu has lost the prestige, etc, etc.

Some are talking that other smaller makers are probably doing better job than Muramatus.

Also, some stores specialized in flute are openly recommending Chinese flute for the instrument under 1K, as the quality of Chinese flutes are much better these days.


Now, as far as the choice of instrument goes, I'm not so experienced in choosing one because I've never really bothered to try other instrument.
It's because I'm not a professional player and the hand made Sakurai has been good enough for my personal need.

However, I head that Sakurai guy originally learned to make flute in Boston (worked for Haynes?) and the went back to Japan and started to make EVERYTHING by himself. He make pads and different parts himself (or with his family), and that his flutes are harder to play at first, but teaches flutists how to play.
And that was exactly what happened, in my case.

Now, I'm buying bunch of cheap to intermediate flutes to compare (and mostly have fun) at eBay.
And I found that I can learn a lot by playing different flutes (and also sometime trouble shooting different minor problems).

One of the thing I leaned recently was about what I call "quantum leap" of the sound quality.
Usually beginners have more or less hollow sounds.
Then intermediate flutists may develop richer sound.
And I was at that intermediate level for many years (because I haven't played for many years...).
But I already knew that when I play in a certain way, the instrument makes suddenly more dense sound, and the difference between the intermediate sound and this denser sound is pretty apparent and not at all gradual. It's a matter of if you have it or you don''t have it.
It's a sudden increase in harmonics and sound strength that can be maintained from forte to pianissimo, once we get used to.
And this quantum leap has the side effect of cutting down the hissing sound and better pitch control and so on, as well.

While testing different flutes, I learned to make the quantum leap of sound with the $31 eBay Chinese flute, $115 Armstrong 103, $195 Gemeinhardt M3, etc. And this trained me to make the quantum leap in different condition that I can now make it happen a lot easier with my Sakurai, too. Smile

And although I can also make better sounds with cheaper instruments, the sound of Sakurai is still the best, for now.

But I may try to switch head joinst of different flutes too see the effect, when I'm done with the simple testing of each flutes I bought.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
de_Genova



Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 7
Location: Roma, Italia

PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:24 am    Post subject: Private messages ??? Reply with quote

What gives here ??? No More Private messages ???

Anyway I am asking about an eBay auction of an Artley Wooden Piccolo - no designation on the type of wood but it looks to be grenadilla; Now my first 'real' flute was a silver plated Artley and I played it for 25 years with never a problem and only one re-pad in all of that time. It was stolen while I was in Rome - I dozed in church during Mass for about thirty seconds but that's all it takes over there - those gypsies are extremely quick and very watchful, and I was no un-seasoned tourist either.

So, can anyone here lend a 'buyers' hand on this little piccolo - value - worthiness etc. I was going to ask JB but the query is open to all........Thank you very much..........

BTW the ad says "RARE" Could that be because its NOT a composite instrument?

PS.........Something I just relaized too - the flute in my Avatar is the cherished Artley ha ha

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=200463845282&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT

UPDATE - I received an answer from the seller in which he concedes to an error in the listing .............BUT I would still like a REVIEW on this instrument............

Dear xxxxxxx,............hello... i apparently made a mistake in the listing and have updated it to add this.. "after talking with an expert today, I have just discovered that this is a composite head and body flute- not wood- it is resonite, which is supposedly better than wood .. it has never been worked on.. it is in original, good condition. It is in the key of C.. it has silver plated keys.. conical bore, stainless steel springs .. it sells new for $2,095.00 ..
... so i am sorry about the mixup... i can still send you pictures if you like.. i should be able to take some in the morning, as well as give you the serial number... again i apologize that i made this mistake, and thanks again for your interest... carl akers
_________________
“Albert, what did you do? This is an amazing headjoint! ” Albert Cooper’s response -
“What do you mean, what did I do? It’s just a hole.”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Fluteland.com Flute Message Board Forum Index -> Flute History, Instruments and Miscellaneous All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group