Conical vs. Cylindrical

Flute History and Instrument Purchase

Moderators: Classitar, pied_piper, Phineas

Post Reply
FltnPicc_David
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 pm
Location: Tampa, FL
Contact:

Conical vs. Cylindrical

Post by FltnPicc_David » Sun Oct 16, 2005 5:53 pm

What's the difference between the two? How do they differ in intonation, scale, etc of the piccolo. Which is better? :?

Band_Geek
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:39 pm

Post by Band_Geek » Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:21 pm

There are piccolos shaped like cones?

Starqle
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 1:35 pm

Post by Starqle » Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:48 pm

Band_Geek, they're not shaped exactly like cones. http://www.topwind.com/instrume/definit ... al/k01.htm has a picture of a wooden conical bore picc as well as a cylindrical metal picc and explains a bit about the difference.

David, conical piccs have better intonation, a more even tone, make some notes easier to play, have a more accurate scale, and are less shrill. Because of this, professionals tend to prefer them. Some doublers (people who play both flute and picc) prefer the cylindrical bore picc as they are more similar to flutes. I play both and don't have a problem going back and forth between my conical picc and cylindrical flute.

I’ve never heard anyone talk about this, but I wonder if it would be wise to get the same bore as the other player if there are two picc playing. I know it’s virtually impossible to get a cylindrical and a conical fife to play in tune together, but maybe piccs don’t have this problem as much... who knows.
Martin Quin

User avatar
Phineas
Posts: 958
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:08 am

Post by Phineas » Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:47 am

Always just an instrument by how it plays, the quality of it, and how it sounds.

I have pics of both type that play and sound great.


Phineas

Post Reply